Papers & Reports

This essay extends the concept of taxing artificial intelligence (AI) firms through equity rather than cash to the international context, proposing a framework under which non-U.S. jurisdictions could require a one-time equity payment from AI firms seeking to sell services within their borders. It challenges the entrenched assumption that taxes must be paid in cash, suggesting that accepting alternative forms of property (e.g., equity) could strengthen both domestic and cross-border taxation in the digital economy.

This article argues that while deglobalisation is often seen as a threat to international taxation by reducing capital mobility, increasing tariff reliance, and pressuring governments to raise domestic taxes, moderate economic fragmentation may actually enhance global tax cooperation. By weakening the dominance of traditional governance structures and fostering a more pluralistic international environment, such fragmentation could empower the emerging UN Framework Tax Convention as a credible alternative to existing OECD-led approaches. The article suggests that measured fragmentation enables the design of tax coordination mechanisms better aligned with a regionalised global economy, promoting more adaptable and realistic frameworks for international tax governance.

Economic Fragmentation And The Future Of International Tax Cooperation (September 26, 2025). Caribbean Tax Law Journal 8 (2025), Special Issue, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5598410 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5598410

This paper examines the fiscal and economic consequences of the Trump administration’s 2025 policy shift, which paired sweeping tariff hikes with major income tax cuts. It shows that while maintaining tariffs at summer 2025 levels would yield substantial government revenue, the efficiency costs would amount to nearly one-third of those revenues, the overall tax system would become less progressive, and enforcement challenges would intensify. Macroeconomically, broad tariffs act as a severe negative supply shock, fueling inflation while depressing economic activity—outcomes that run counter to the policy’s stated goals.

This article critically assesses the Global Minimum Tax, agreed upon by more than 140 countries and hailed as the most important reform of international business taxation in a century. While recognizing the political and technical achievement, it argues that the reform’s impact is mixed and that the international tax system remains fundamentally weak. The analysis attributes this to the policy itself rather than to flaws in implementation, emphasizing that layering a minimum tax onto the existing origin-based framework leaves intact the system’s incentive incompatibilities and destabilizing forces. By reinforcing this flawed foundation, the Global Minimum Tax not only limits its own effectiveness but also makes it harder to pursue alternative reforms that would break from the origin-based model. The article concludes that despite the celebrated breakthrough, the system continues to perform poorly and that more radical reform options are being sidelined.

This article uses New Zealand to illustrate how tax transparency shapes public trust in government, the private sector, and among taxpayers, with particular attention to corporate income taxation of multinationals and its effects on voluntary compliance in an open-economy welfare state. The article analyzes the interaction of New Zealand’s tax system and financial reporting regime, alongside Google’s reporting practices, and identifies three structural weaknesses: poor coordination between tax and reporting frameworks, limited transparency in tax administration, and weak mechanisms for addressing distrust of multinationals. It concludes that reforms to strengthen disclosure and align regulatory structures are essential to protect the integrity of the tax system and voluntary compliance, offering lessons for other jurisdictions such as Canada.

This article provides a comprehensive assessment of U.S. tariff policies, tracing their historical evolution, theoretical foundations, and practical impacts. It shows how tariffs reshape trade flows, raise input costs, and trigger retaliation, with effects across manufacturing, agriculture, energy, and technology. Firm-level responses include sourcing shifts and supply chain reconfiguration, while broader outcomes appear in GDP, inflation, jobs, and investment. The study also highlights the role of market structure in shaping welfare effects and situates tariff design within political economy dynamics such as stakeholder influence and electoral pressures. It notes emerging patterns linking tariffs to geopolitical strategy and trade agreements, while stressing how policy uncertainty complicates supply chains. The paper concludes by pointing to future research on tariffs’ ties to innovation, the environment, and global governance.

This paper develops a three-country theoretical model and uses highly disaggregated transaction-level data on South Korea’s imports to analyze how third-country tariffs influence bilateral trade flows. The study shows that while bilateral applied tariffs directly reduce imports, higher tariffs imposed on competing third-country suppliers divert trade toward the partner country, with the effect varying by preferential regime and the number of alternative suppliers. These results underscore that the trade consequences of tariff changes cannot be fully understood without accounting for third-country tariff schedules, a consideration especially relevant amid current U.S. proposals for broad tariff increases.

This study investigates the economic consequences of the European Union’s 2019 earnings stripping rules, which restrict interest deductibility based on a firm’s profitability under the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. The analysis shows that the reform reduced operational risk-taking, investment, and innovation, as profit-contingent deductibility diminished the expected debt tax shield in low-profit years. The negative effects are most pronounced for firms with higher pre-reform operating risk, which subsequently face slower growth and a greater likelihood of financial distress. The findings demonstrate that profit-linked interest limitations carry significant real effects, highlighting the need for careful rule design to balance anti-avoidance goals with the preservation of firms’ investment and innovation capacity.

Source: TRR 266 Accounting for Transparency Working Paper Series No. 210

This article argues that trade wars should be understood fundamentally as tax wars, positioning tariff policy within the broader fiscal architecture of the U.S. tax system. Against escalating global economic tensions, it contends that tariffs, often framed as protectionist measures, actually reflect structural distortions in U.S. taxation. The analysis develops across three dimensions: reshoring production, promoting fair trade, and raising revenue. These show how tariff policy is intertwined with tax rules. Importantly, it challenges the conventional view that U.S. export mechanisms such as the Domestic International Sales Corporation, the Foreign Sales Corporation, and the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion arose as responses to European VAT border adjustments, arguing instead that they were designed to address deficiencies within the U.S. corporate income tax regime.

This paper examines the risks of creating a permanent establishment (PE) from work-from-home arrangements, focusing on the legal framework under Article 5 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and its commentaries. It analyzes case law across jurisdictions to show how tax authorities are interpreting PE rules in light of remote work and explores the practical and economic consequences of treating an employee’s home office as a PE. The paper concludes by proposing clarifications to the existing framework to better align with the OECD’s objectives and provide greater certainty for taxpayers and administrations in an evolving work environment.