Skip to main content

Papers & Reports

Understanding the Impact of OECD BEPS Actions on Double Tax Treaties

  • By Akin Akinrinde

This article explores the profound impact of the OECD's BEPS project on double taxation treaties.  It underscores the intricate interplay between the need to curb base erosion and profit shifting while maintaining a conducive environment for global economic activities.

The author purports that measures such as the Principal Purpose Test (PPT), the Limitation on Benefits (LOB), and the redefinition of permanent establishment, mark a significant stride towards aligning taxation with economic substance. These measures, though complex, are instrumental in mitigating the exploitation of tax treaties and ensuring that profits are taxed where actual economic activities and value creation occur.

To read more go here

The Untold Tale of a Tax Rulings Haven

  • By Leandra Lederman

The “LuxLeaks” scandal revealed numerous secret deals granted by the small country of Luxembourg to large multinational companies. These sweetheart deals occurred in the form of Luxembourg tax rulings, which allowed many name-brand companies to dodge huge amounts of tax that would otherwise be due to the U.S. or other countries. This article explores the origin and aftermath of Luxembourg’s informal tax ruling process and how it became so prolific. The author argues that the amenability of the tax administration, trust in the Luxembourg government, and secrecy were the foundations for attracting major multinational companies to these tax deals.

Leandra Lederman, The Untold Tale of a Tax Rulings Haven, 29 Stan. J.L. Bus. & Fin. (forthcoming 2024).

To read more go here

Exchange of Information, Tax Confidentiality, Privacy and Data Protection from an EU Perspective

  • By Esther Huiskers-Stoop, Breuer Almut, and Mark Nieuweboer

The call for more transparency in the tax world can hardly be overstated. One of the most prominent ways to achieve tax transparency is the exchange of information between countries. However, achieving a proper balance between the exchange of information, tax confidentiality, and privacy is quite a challenge. In this article, the authors investigate some of these challenges. More specifically, the authors elaborate on the issue of international and European data exchange obligations in light of the privacy provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Esther Huiskers-Stoop, Breuer Almut, & Mark Nieuweboer, Exchange of Information, Tax Confidentiality, Privacy and Data Protection from an EU Perspective, 2 Erasmus L. Rev. 86 (2022).

To read more go here

Analysis of Developments in EU Capital Flows in the Global Context (2023)

  • By European Commission

This report presents an analysis of the main trends and developments in global and EU capital movements up to mid-2023, focusing on recent developments.

To read more go here

Pillar One - Amount B

  • By OECD

The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS released the report on Amount B of Pillar One, which provides a simplified and streamlined approach to the application of the arm's length principle to baseline marketing and distribution activities, with a particular focus on the needs of low-capacity countries.

To read more go here

Cryptocurrency Investments and Taxation: Analyzing Global Responses by Tax Authorities

  • By Akin Akinrinde

The emergence of cryptocurrencies has dramatically transformed the financial landscape, ushering in a new era of digital assets. The lack of uniformity in the classification of cryptocurrencies—whether as property, currency, or something entirely distinct—has led to a patchwork of tax treatments across different jurisdictions. This classification bears significant implications for tax liabilities, which requires a nuanced understanding of local tax laws.  This article underscores the role of international organizations like the OECD and FATF in attempting to forge a consensus and harmonize tax rules across borders to mitigate issues of tax evasion and double taxation.

To read more go here

The Proposal for a Council Directive on Transfer Pricing: An Assessment

  • By Pasquale Pistone, João Félix Pinto Nogueira, Sergio Messina, Alessandro Turina, and Ivan Lazarov

The purpose of this study is to provide feedback to the European Commission and the European Parliament on the proposed Council Directive on transfer pricing (the proposed Directive). The proposed Directive follows the impact assessment of this initiative, and it seeks to integrate key transfer pricing principles into EU law to put forward certain common approaches for Member States in the European Union. The comments of this study seek to provide constructive technical input, including alternative solutions. This might overcome the identified issues and, thus, support the EU institutions to improve the proposed text. The study has revealed that there are discrepancies between the EU Commission’s aim to align with the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines. These discrepancies might frustrate the goal of positive integration and cast doubt on whether the proposed Directive can promote legal and tax certainty while simplifying compliance.

Pasquale Pistone, João Félix Pinto Nogueira, Sergio Messina, Alessandro Turina & Ivan Lazarov, The Proposal for a Council Directive on Transfer Pricing: An Assessment, IBFD (2024).  

 

To read more go here

Deterrence and Displacement in Offshore Trade: Evidence from the Panama Papers Leak

  • By Mark Buckwalter Figueroa, Raymond J. Fisman, April M. Knill, and Sergey Mityakov

Using detailed firm-level exports for Ukrainian firms, the authors demonstrate a robust negative decline in trade conducted through Panama in the aftermath of the Panama Papers data leak. International trade-related financial transactions going through Panama fell by 12-17 percent (conditioned on trade flows being present) and the fraction of trade going through Panama declined from 22 percent to less than 10 percent at the exporting firm level. At least some of this decline was offset by trade through other offshore havens. This paper offers policy-relevant evidence on the role of displacement in limiting any efforts at curbing offshore activities. To the extent that such efforts focus on a subset of offshore havens, companies can shift transactions, even in the relatively short run, to other more compliant jurisdictions. Thus, the findings of this paper reinforce the potential revenue benefits of proposals, such as the global minimum tax of 15 percent proposed by the OECD and the critical importance of broad-based participation in these initiatives.

To read more go here

The consequences of the 2017 US international tax reform: a survey of the evidence

  • By Dhammika Dharmapala

The 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act (TCJA) introduced the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI). This paper surveys the empirical literature on the impact of the TCJA’s international provisions. It documents five robust findings in this empirical literature. First, the TCJA led to a general decline in US MNCs’ foreign acquisitions. Second, the TCJA increased US MNCs’ investment in routine foreign tangible assets. Third, the reform did not lead to any change in profit shifting by US MNCs beyond the magnitude that would be expected based on the TCJA’s tax rate reduction. Fourth, The TCJA appears to have reduced the market value of US MNCs relative to domestic US firms. Lastly, the TCJA does not appear to have had any detectable impact on domestic US investment and wages (although there are some contrary results for capital expenditures).

To read more go here

Whither LOB?

  • By Reuven S. Avi-Yonah

On January 1, 2024, the 1979 tax treaty between the U.S. and Hungary was officially terminated. A revised treaty was signed in 2010 but was never ratified by the United States. This paper uses the termination of the U.S.-Hungarian treaty to argue that a limitation on benefits (LOB) article is not effective in preventing double non-taxation. Terminating Hungary’s treaty with the U.S. because it lacks a LOB will not achieve the twin goals of preventing treaty shopping and double non-taxation, especially since other US treaties do not have a LOB article. Instead, the US should follow the rest of the world and adopt the principal purpose test (PPT) in its future tax treaties.

 

To read more go here
Back to top