2026

This article analyzes the global impact of President Trump’s newly announced flat-rate tariff following the Supreme Court ruling on earlier levies. It examines how major trading partners—including China, Brazil, the EU and Japan—may be differentially affected, highlighting cross-border trade flows, retaliatory risks, and the broader implications for international economic alignment and global supply chains.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

Senior US officials said President Donald Trump’s tariff defeat at the Supreme Court won’t unravel deals negotiated with US partners as they sought to defend the administration’s assertive trade policies.

In a swift reversal of fortunes, countries that had been hardest hit by US President Donald Trump’s tariffs have emerged as the biggest winners from the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down his emergency levies.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent dodged questions about refunds after the Supreme Court struck the vast majority of President Trump’s tariffs down.

This article examines the international fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision invalidating key components of President Trump’s tariff program. The ruling raises significant uncertainty for bilateral and regional trade agreements negotiated under tariff pressure, including arrangements with major U.S. trading partners. The piece analyzes how governments and firms may reassess commitments made in response to threatened or imposed tariffs, and considers the broader implications for trade diplomacy and cross-border economic stability.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

Following the Supreme Court’s rejection of the administration’s use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs, this article explores the alternative statutory authorities available to the executive branch. It outlines the legal frameworks under U.S. trade law—including national security and unfair trade practice provisions—that may serve as the basis for continued tariff actions. The piece situates the ruling within the broader separation-of-powers debate and highlights the ongoing legal and economic uncertainty facing international trade partners.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

The Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down the sweeping global tariffs at the heart of President Trump’s economic policies has produced enormous cracks in the GOP’s outward show of party unity.

Millionaire investor Kevin O’Leary warned of a “major compliance cost” for business owners in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling that blocks President Trump from using emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision striking down President Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose global tariffs, companies are scrambling to determine whether they can recover billions in paid duties and how to respond to the administration’s newly announced 10% global tariff under a different legal authority. The article examines the legal uncertainty surrounding tariff authority and the practical consequences for multinational businesses and trade flows.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

The Supreme Court’s decision to nullify a large swath of the Trump administration’s tariffs cleared the way for companies to seek refunds of tariffs already paid, which could come with a slew of transfer pricing issues for them to navigate.