2026

This article reviews the legal and structural fallout following the Supreme Court’s invalidation of key Trump tariffs. It discusses the administration’s attempt to rely on alternative statutory authority and considers the broader institutional consequences for U.S. trade powers, global supply chains, and the stability of cross-border fiscal measures affecting international commerce.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

This article analyzes the Supreme Court’s decision limiting President Trump’s use of emergency tariff authority and examines the structural implications for executive power over cross-border fiscal measures. The ruling reshapes the allocation of economic authority between Congress and the president, with consequences for the future design of tariff-based revenue tools affecting international commerce.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

To read more, click here.

This article focuses on the European response to the Supreme Court’s decision invalidating portions of the U.S. tariff regime. European officials had anticipated stabilization in transatlantic trade relations, but the ruling introduces new uncertainty regarding future U.S. trade policy. The piece examines the broader implications for EU–U.S. economic coordination, trade negotiations, and geopolitical dynamics amid ongoing tensions with China and other major economies.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

This article analyzes the global impact of President Trump’s newly announced flat-rate tariff following the Supreme Court ruling on earlier levies. It examines how major trading partners—including China, Brazil, the EU and Japan—may be differentially affected, highlighting cross-border trade flows, retaliatory risks, and the broader implications for international economic alignment and global supply chains.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

Senior US officials said President Donald Trump’s tariff defeat at the Supreme Court won’t unravel deals negotiated with US partners as they sought to defend the administration’s assertive trade policies.

In a swift reversal of fortunes, countries that had been hardest hit by US President Donald Trump’s tariffs have emerged as the biggest winners from the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down his emergency levies.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent dodged questions about refunds after the Supreme Court struck the vast majority of President Trump’s tariffs down.

This article examines the international fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision invalidating key components of President Trump’s tariff program. The ruling raises significant uncertainty for bilateral and regional trade agreements negotiated under tariff pressure, including arrangements with major U.S. trading partners. The piece analyzes how governments and firms may reassess commitments made in response to threatened or imposed tariffs, and considers the broader implications for trade diplomacy and cross-border economic stability.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).

Following the Supreme Court’s rejection of the administration’s use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs, this article explores the alternative statutory authorities available to the executive branch. It outlines the legal frameworks under U.S. trade law—including national security and unfair trade practice provisions—that may serve as the basis for continued tariff actions. The piece situates the ruling within the broader separation-of-powers debate and highlights the ongoing legal and economic uncertainty facing international trade partners.

To read the full article, click here (subscription required).